EN
Category:Bikes

Argon 18 vs Scott: Bikes

Argon 18 and Scott are two prominent brands in the cycling industry, each offering a range of high-performance bikes. Argon 18 is known for its innovative designs and focus on competitive cycling, while Scott emphasizes versatility and technology across various cycling disciplines. This comparison highlights their core strengths, product offerings, and unique market positions.

Start voting in BikesSee site statistics

Live Picks

Argon 18187 (4%)
Scott4,160 (96%)

Numbers reflect total picks in the Bikes category.

Argon 18

187 picks (4%) in Bikes

Innovative and performance-driven, catering to serious cyclists.

  • •Argon 18 E-117
  • •Argon 18 Krypton
  • •Argon 18 Gallium
Shop Argon 18

Scott

4,160 picks (96%) in Bikes

Versatile and tech-savvy, appealing to a broad cycling audience.

  • •Scott Addict
  • •Scott Speedster
  • •Scott Genius
Shop Scott

Quick Facts

CriterionArgon 18Scott
Founded20061958
HeadquartersMontreal, CanadaGivisiez, Switzerland
Price TierMid to HighMid to High
Innovation FocusAerodynamicsVersatility
Warranty2 years2 years
SustainabilityNot clearly disclosed publiclyNot clearly disclosed publicly
Core StrengthTime trial bikesAll-mountain bikes

Pros & Cons: Argon 18

  • ✅Lightweight designs
  • ✅Strong aerodynamics
  • ✅Custom geometry options
  • ✅High-quality materials
  • ⚠️Limited range of models
  • ⚠️Higher price point
  • ⚠️Less brand recognition
  • ⚠️Not as versatile

Pros & Cons: Scott

  • ✅Wide range of models
  • ✅Innovative technology
  • ✅Good value for money
  • ✅Strong brand presence
  • ⚠️Heavier than competitors
  • ⚠️Less focus on aerodynamics
  • ⚠️Some models may lack uniqueness
  • ⚠️Not as customizable
Cast your vote in BikesBack to Home

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.